Skip to main content

Engineer's DNS Intelligence Report

porp.stream Critical Risk
12 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC · 22.8s ·v26.50.05-119-g1c2a42874 · SHA-3-512: 5b4b✱✱✱✱ Verify ·Cross-Referenced
Engineer workspace · evidence preserved

Read the verdict first. Descend only as far as the incident requires.

This report keeps the complete technical record while separating decision, interpretation, evidence, and raw reproduction into a stable disclosure gradient.

L0PostureL1InterpretationL2EvidenceL3Raw & reproduce
Hurry path
KEYBOARD !1@2#3$4%5^6 jump to that section · esc back to the verdict
Sorted by severity — worst first
Email Spoofing
Vulnerable
Brand Impersonation
Not Setup
DNS Tampering
Partially Signed
Certificate Control
Open
Monitoring
Not Setup
DANE
Not Deployed
TRACE L0 · Email Spoofing — Vulnerable L1 · 01 · Email Security · SPF/DMARC L3 · Reproduce commands
Action Required
No SPF and no DMARC — domain is completely unprotected against email spoofing. Both protocols are RFC-recommended (not mandatory), but their absence leaves the domain open to impersonation (CVE-2024-7208, CVE-2024-49040)
Not Configured
SPF, DMARC, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, BIMI, DANE, DNSSEC, CAA
Recommended
Publish an SPF record to authorize legitimate mail senders, Publish a DMARC record starting with p=none and rua reporting
Monitoring
DKIM signing inferred from provider — could not directly verify selector
Configured
DKIM (inferred via Unknown)
Priority Actions 4 total Achievable posture: Low Risk
High Add DMARC Reject for No-Mail Domain

This domain has no MX records and appears to be a website-only domain. A DMARC reject policy tells receiving mail servers to reject any email claiming to be from your domain.

High Lock Down SPF for No-Mail Domain

This domain has no MX records and appears to be a website-only domain. Publishing a strict SPF record explicitly declares that no servers are authorized to send email, preventing attackers from spoofing your domain.

Medium Enable DNSSEC

DNSSEC is not enabled for this domain. DNSSEC provides cryptographic authentication of DNS responses, preventing cache poisoning and DNS spoofing attacks.

Registrar (RDAP) OBSERVED LIVE
NameCheap, Inc.
Where domain was purchased
Email Service Provider
Unknown
Unprotected
Web Hosting
Unknown
Where website is hosted
DNS Hosting
Cloudflare Enterprise
Where DNS records are edited
Footprint Cloudflare
01 Identity & policy · L1 Email Security Can this domain be impersonated by email? SPF DMARC DKIM MTA-STS TLS-RPT MX & Routing Vulnerable
Email Security Methodology Can this domain be impersonated by email? Yes no SPF or DMARC protection

SPF Record RFC 7208 §4 Gold

Does this domain declare who may send email on its behalf? No
Warning

No SPF record found

RFC Stance: RFC 7208 defines the SPF mechanism for domains that choose to publish sender authorization. The standard does not mandate SPF publication — it is a voluntary security control.
Operational Security: We flag its absence because any server on the internet can send email claiming to be this domain. Attackers send from a domain — they do not need the domain to have email infrastructure.
RFC Failure Mode: Unlike DMARC (where unknown tags are silently ignored per RFC 7489 §6.3), SPF with unrecognized mechanisms produces a PermError per RFC 7208 §4.6 — the record fails loudly rather than silently.
Related CVEs: CVE-2024-7208 (multi-tenant domain spoofing), CVE-2024-7209 (shared SPF exploitation), CVE-2023-51764 (SMTP smuggling bypasses SPF)

DMARC Policy RFC 7489 §6.3 Gold

Are spoofed emails rejected or quarantined? No policy published
Warning

No DMARC record found

RFC Stance: RFC 7489 is classified as Informational (not Standards Track). DMARC is a widely adopted industry practice but is not an IETF-mandated standard.
Operational Security: Without DMARC, receiving mail servers have no policy for handling SPF/DKIM failures. Spoofed messages may be delivered to recipients.
DMARCbis (Pending): draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis will elevate DMARC to Standards Track, obsolete RFC 7489, replace pct= with t= (testing flag), add np= (non-existent subdomain policy), and mandate DNS tree walk for policy discovery instead of the Public Suffix List.
Related CVEs: CVE-2024-49040 (Exchange sender spoofing), CVE-2024-7208 (multi-tenant DMARC bypass)

DKIM Records RFC 6376 §3.6 Gold

Are outbound emails cryptographically signed? Not discoverable
Not Discoverable

DKIM not discoverable via common selectors (large providers use rotating selectors)

RFC 6376 (Provider-Managed) — DKIM signing managed by the detected mail provider per RFC 6376.
Known Vulnerabilities: DKIM l= tag body length vulnerability (attacker appends unsigned content to signed mail), weak key exploitation (keys below 1024-bit are cryptographically breakable per RFC 6376 §3.3.3), DKIM replay attacks (re-sending legitimately signed messages at scale)

MTA-STS RFC 8461 §3 Gold

Can attackers downgrade SMTP to intercept mail? Not prevented
Warning

No MTA-STS record found

MTA-STS policy enforcement is evaluated in Mail Transport Security below.

TLS-RPT RFC 8460 §3 Gold

Will failures in TLS delivery be reported? No reporting
Warning

No TLS-RPT record found

02 Chain of authority · L1 Domain Security Can DNS answers and certificate issuance be trusted? DANE / TLSA CAA Delegation DNSSEC Operations DNSSEC & NS Partially Signed

DANE / TLSA Gold Recon Methodology Can mail servers establish identity without a public CA? No
RFC 7672 §3 RFC 6698 §2 Not Configured

No MX records available — DANE check skipped

DANE (RFC 7672) binds TLS certificates to DNSSEC-signed DNS records, protecting email transport against man-in-the-middle attacks and rogue CAs. It is the primary transport security standard — MTA-STS (RFC 8461) was created as the alternative for domains that cannot deploy DNSSEC. Over 1 million domains use DANE globally, including Microsoft Exchange Online, Proton Mail, and Fastmail. Best practice: deploy both for defense in depth.

Email Transport Security

Two mechanisms protect email in transit. DANE is the primary standard; MTA-STS is the alternative for domains that cannot deploy DNSSEC:

  • DNSSEC + DANE (RFC 7672) — Cryptographic chain of trust from DNS root to mail server certificate. Eliminates reliance on certificate authorities. No trust-on-first-use weakness. Requires DNSSEC.
  • MTA-STS (RFC 8461) — HTTPS-based policy requiring TLS for mail delivery. Works without DNSSEC but relies on CA trust and is vulnerable on first use (§10). Created for domains where “deploying DNSSEC is undesirable or impractical” (§2).
This domain has neither DANE nor MTA-STS. Mail transport relies on opportunistic TLS without policy enforcement, leaving it vulnerable to downgrade attacks. Deploy DANE (RFC 7672) with DNSSEC for the strongest protection, or MTA-STS (RFC 8461) if DNSSEC is not feasible.

Industry trend: Microsoft Exchange Online enforces inbound DANE with DNSSEC (GA October 2024), and providers like Proton Mail and Fastmail also support DANE. Google Workspace does not support DANE and relies on MTA-STS. Both mechanisms coexist because DANE is backward-compatible — senders skip the check if the domain isn't DNSSEC-signed (RFC 7672 §1.3).

CAA RFC 8659 §4 Gold Warning

Does this domain restrict who can issue TLS certificates? No

No CAA records found - any CA can issue certificates

Delegation Consistency 2 Issues

Delegation consistency: 2 issue(s) found — Parent/child NS delegation alignment: DS↔DNSKEY, glue records, TTL drift, SOA serial sync.

Findings:
  • DS records missing at parent — DNSSEC chain of trust is broken
  • Could not retrieve NS TTL from parent zone

DS ↔ DNSKEY Alignment Misaligned

DNSKEY records without matching DS:
Key Tag: 34505, Flags: 256
Key Tag: 2371, Flags: 257 (KSK)

Glue Record Completeness Complete

NameserverIn-BailiwickIPv4 GlueIPv6 GlueStatus
anita.ns.cloudflare.com No N/A N/A OK
margo.ns.cloudflare.com No N/A N/A OK

NS TTL Comparison Drift

Child TTL: 86400s Drift: 0s

SOA Serial Consistency Consistent

anita.ns.cloudflare.com: 2.411602186e+09
margo.ns.cloudflare.com: 2.411602186e+09
DNSSEC Operations Deep Dive 1 Issue

DNSSEC operational notes: 1 item(s) to review — KSK/ZSK differentiation, RRSIG expiry windows, NSEC/NSEC3 analysis, and rollover readiness.

Findings:
  • CDS/CDNSKEY automation present but only single KSK — pre-publish second KSK before rollover

DNSKEY Inventory 2 Keys

RoleKey TagAlgorithmKey Size
ZSK 34505 ECDSA P-256/SHA-256 256 bits
KSK 2371 ECDSA P-256/SHA-256 256 bits

RRSIG Signatures 0 Signatures

No RRSIG records found.

Denial of Existence NSEC

NSEC records expose zone contents via ordered names (zone walking). Consider NSEC3 for zone enumeration protection.

Rollover Readiness Partial

Multiple KSKs:
CDS Published:
CDNSKEY Published:
Automation: full

Domain Security Methodology Can DNS responses be tampered with in transit? Possible DNSSEC is not deployed, DNS responses are not cryptographically verified

DNSSEC RFC 4033 §2 Gold Partially Signed

DNSSEC partially configured - DNSKEY exists but DS record missing at registrar

DNSKEY exists but DS record not published at registrar. Add DS record to complete chain of trust.

NS Delegation Verified

2 nameserver(s) configured

Nameservers: anita.ns.cloudflare.com margo.ns.cloudflare.com
Managed DNS
All 2 nameservers hosted by Cloudflare. Managed DNS provides reliable resolution with provider-maintained infrastructure.
DNS provider(s): Cloudflare
Multi-Resolver Verification Recon: Consensus reached - 5 resolvers (Cloudflare, Google, Quad9, OpenDNS, DNS4EU) agree on DNS records

CDS / CDNSKEY (DNSSEC Automation) RFC 7344 Success CDS CDNSKEY

DNSSEC deletion signaled via CDS/CDNSKEY (RFC 8078 §4)

Key TagAlgorithmDigest TypeDigest
0 0
CDNSKEY Records:
FlagsProtocolAlgorithmPublic Key
0 3
03 Delivery path · L1 Transport Security Will mail transport resist downgrade and interception? STARTTLS MTA-STS policy TLS-RPT
Mail Transport Security Beta Is mail transport encrypted and verified? No No MTA-STS or DANE — mail transport encryption is opportunistic only

No MX records found

Policy Assessment Primary

No transport enforcement policies detected. Mail delivery relies on opportunistic STARTTLS, which is vulnerable to downgrade attacks (RFC 3207). Consider deploying MTA-STS (RFC 8461) or DANE (RFC 7672).

Telemetry
TLS-RPT not configured — domain has no visibility into TLS delivery failures from real senders
Live Probe Supplementary
Skipped — No MX records found for this domain
What Is Measured: Our probe’s TLS 1.3 handshake offers the hybrid post-quantum group X25519MLKEM768 (X25519 combined with ML-KEM-768). The Key Exchange column reports the group each mail server actually negotiated — direct, observed evidence of its post-quantum readiness toward a hybrid-capable client.
Quantum-Safe Hybrid: The session key agreement combines classical X25519 with ML-KEM-768, standardized in FIPS 203 (final, August 2024). This protects the key exchange against “harvest now, decrypt later” collection by a future quantum adversary.
Classical: The server completed the handshake without selecting the offered hybrid group. This is not a deviation — no RFC currently requires post-quantum key exchange. The X25519MLKEM768 group is defined in draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem (Standards Track draft, not yet an RFC); the hybrid approach is described in draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design (IESG-approved Informational). Servers supporting only other hybrid groups also read as Classical here.
Transition Outlook: NIST’s draft transition guidance (NIST IR 8547) projects quantum-vulnerable algorithms being deprecated after 2030 and disallowed after 2035. Hybrid key exchange requires TLS 1.3. This finding is informational and does not affect this domain’s grade.
04 Human-visible identity · L1 Brand & Trust Can this brand be convincingly faked? BIMI & VMC CAA · see Domain Security Not Setup

Brand Security Can this brand be convincingly faked? Yes No DMARC policy (RFC 7489) — attackers can send email appearing to be from this domain with no sender-authentication barrier

BIMI BIMI Spec Gold Warning

Is the brand identity verified and displayed in inboxes? No

No BIMI record found

05 Ownership & attack surface · L1 Infrastructure Intelligence Who operates this domain, and what is exposed? Registrar / RDAP security.txt AI Surface Subdomains
Vulnerability Disclosure Policy (security.txt) Is there a verified way to report security issues? Partial RFC 9116

security.txt found but missing required fields

Contact

Missing (required by RFC 9116 §2.5.3)

Expires

Missing (required by RFC 9116 §2.5.5)
Missing required Contact field (RFC 9116 §2.5.3)
Missing required Expires field (RFC 9116 §2.5.5)


AI Surface Scanner Beta Is this domain discoverable by AI — and protected from abuse? No

No AI governance measures detected

llms.txt llmstxt.org
Is this domain publishing AI-readable brand context? No
No llms.txt found
No llms-full.txt found
AI Crawler Governance (robots.txt) RFC 9309 IETF Draft
Are AI crawlers explicitly allowed or blocked? Not blocked
No AI crawler blocking observed — no blocking directives found in robots.txt View robots.txt
Content-Usage Directive IETF Draft
Does the site express AI content-usage preferences? Not Configured
No Content-Usage directive detected. The IETF AI Preferences working group is developing a Content-Usage: directive for robots.txt that lets site owners declare whether their content may be used for AI training and inference. This is an active draft, not yet a ratified standard.
Example: Add Content-Usage: ai=no to robots.txt to deny AI training, or Content-Usage: ai=allow to explicitly permit it. Without this directive, AI crawler behavior depends on individual crawler policies and User-agent rules.
AI Recommendation Poisoning
Is this site trying to manipulate AI recommendations? No
No AI recommendation poisoning indicators found
Hidden Prompt Artifacts
Is hidden prompt-injection text present in the source? No
No hidden prompt-like artifacts detected
Evidence Log (1 item)
TypeDetailSeverityConfidence
robots_txt_no_ai_blocks robots.txt found but no AI-specific blocking directives low Observed
Public Exposure Checks Are sensitive files or secrets exposed? No

No exposed secrets detected in public page source — same-origin, non-intrusive scan of publicly visible page source and scripts.

No exposed secrets, API keys, or credentials were detected in publicly accessible page source or scripts.
What type of scan is this?

This is OSINT (Open Source Intelligence) collection — we check the same publicly accessible URLs that any web browser could visit. No authentication is bypassed, no ports are probed, no vulnerabilities are exploited.

Is this a PCI compliance scan? No. PCI DSS requires scans performed by an Approved Scanning Vendor (ASV) certified by the PCI Security Standards Council. DNS Tool is not an ASV. If you need PCI compliance scanning, engage a certified ASV such as Qualys, Tenable, or Trustwave.

Is this a penetration test? No. Penetration testing involves active exploitation attempts against systems with authorization. Our checks are passive observation of publicly accessible resources — the same methodology used by Shodan, Mozilla Observatory, and other OSINT platforms.

DNS Server Security Not Checked

Nmap not available — Nmap NSE probes for zone transfer (AXFR), open recursion (RFC 5358), nameserver identity disclosure, and DNS cache snooping.

Check Result Detail
Zone Transfer (AXFR) Denied Not tested
Open Recursion Disabled Not tested
Nameserver Identity Hidden Not tested
Cache Snooping Protected Not tested
Nameserver Fleet Matrix Healthy

Analyzed 2 nameserver(s) for porp.stream — Per-nameserver reachability, ASN diversity, SOA serial sync, and lame delegation checks.

Nameserver IPv4 IPv6 ASN / Operator UDP TCP AA SOA Serial Anycast Node
anita.ns.cloudflare.com 108.162.194.82
162.159.38.82
172.64.34.82
2606:4700:50::a29f:2652
2a06:98c1:50::ac40:2252
2803:f800:50::6ca2:c252
AS13335
Cloudflare, Inc.
2411602186 N/A
margo.ns.cloudflare.com 108.162.195.144
162.159.44.144
172.64.35.144
2a06:98c1:50::ac40:2390
2606:4700:58::a29f:2c90
2803:f800:50::6ca2:c390
AS13335
Cloudflare, Inc.
2411602186 N/A
Unique ASNs
1
Unique Operators
1
Unique /24 Prefixes
6
Diversity Score
Fair

1 ASN(s), 6 /24 prefix(es) — consider adding diversity

Infrastructure Intelligence Who hosts this domain and what services power it? Direct

ASN / Network Success

Resolved 1 unique ASN(s) across 1 IP address(es)

ASNNameCountry
AS32613 CA
IPv4 Mappings:
198.72.98.27AS32613 (198.72.96.0/19)

Edge / CDN Success

Domain appears to use direct origin hosting

SaaS TXT Footprint Success

No SaaS verification records detected

Detects SaaS services that leave DNS TXT verification records (e.g., domain ownership proofs). Does not detect all SaaS platforms — only those indicated by DNS.

Traffic & Routing Where does this domain's traffic actually terminate?

AIPv4 Address

198.72.98.27
Where the domain points for web traffic

AAAAIPv6 Address

No AAAA records
IPv6 not configured

MXMail Servers

No MX records
Domain cannot receive email

SRVServices

No SRV records
No service-specific routing configured
Web: Reachable (1 IPv4, 0 IPv6) Mail: Not configured Services: None
Subdomain Discovery RFC 6962 Recon LIVE What subdomains and infrastructure are exposed in certificate logs? 511 subdomains discovered
How did we find these?
Certificate Transparency Logs Unavailable The results below are from DNS probing only and may be significantly incomplete. CT logs typically reveal hundreds or thousands of additional subdomains via certificate issuance history (RFC 6962).
CT logs unavailable 511 current 0 expired Source: Certificate Transparency + DNS Intelligence
Subdomains discovered via CT logs (RFC 6962), DNS probing of common service names, and CNAME chain traversal.
Subdomain Source Status Provider / CNAME Certificates First Seen Issuer(s)
a.porp.stream DNS Current
academy.porp.stream DNS Current
account.porp.stream DNS Current
accounting.porp.stream DNS Current
accounts.porp.stream DNS Current
ad.porp.stream DNS Current
adfs.porp.stream DNS Current
admin.porp.stream DNS Current
admin1.porp.stream DNS Current
admin2.porp.stream DNS Current
alert.porp.stream DNS Current
alerts.porp.stream DNS Current
alpha.porp.stream DNS Current
analytics.porp.stream DNS Current
ap-south.porp.stream DNS Current
ap.porp.stream DNS Current
apac.porp.stream DNS Current
api.porp.stream DNS Current
api1.porp.stream DNS Current
api2.porp.stream DNS Current
api3.porp.stream DNS Current
apigw.porp.stream DNS Current
apis.porp.stream DNS Current
apm.porp.stream DNS Current
app.porp.stream DNS Current
app1.porp.stream DNS Current
app2.porp.stream DNS Current
appointments.porp.stream DNS Current
apps.porp.stream DNS Current
archive.porp.stream DNS Current
archives.porp.stream DNS Current
asia.porp.stream DNS Current
assets.porp.stream DNS Current
atom.porp.stream DNS Current
auth.porp.stream DNS Current
auth0.porp.stream DNS Current
autoconfig.porp.stream DNS Current
autodiscover.porp.stream DNS Current
b.porp.stream DNS Current
backup.porp.stream DNS Current
backup1.porp.stream DNS Current
backup2.porp.stream DNS Current
beta.porp.stream DNS Current
bi.porp.stream DNS Current
bigdata.porp.stream DNS Current
billing.porp.stream DNS Current
bitbucket.porp.stream DNS Current
blob.porp.stream DNS Current
blog.porp.stream DNS Current
booking.porp.stream DNS Current
broker.porp.stream DNS Current
bucket.porp.stream DNS Current
build.porp.stream DNS Current
builds.porp.stream DNS Current
c.porp.stream DNS Current
ca.porp.stream DNS Current
cache.porp.stream DNS Current
cal.porp.stream DNS Current
calendar.porp.stream DNS Current
campaign.porp.stream DNS Current
campaigns.porp.stream DNS Current
careers.porp.stream DNS Current
cart.porp.stream DNS Current
catalog.porp.stream DNS Current
cd.porp.stream DNS Current
cdn.porp.stream DNS Current
cdn1.porp.stream DNS Current
cdn2.porp.stream DNS Current
cdn3.porp.stream DNS Current
cert.porp.stream DNS Current
certs.porp.stream DNS Current
chat.porp.stream DNS Current
checkout.porp.stream DNS Current
ci.porp.stream DNS Current
client.porp.stream DNS Current
clients.porp.stream DNS Current
cloud.porp.stream DNS Current
cms.porp.stream DNS Current
cname.porp.stream DNS Current
code.porp.stream DNS Current
community.porp.stream DNS Current
compliance.porp.stream DNS Current
conference.porp.stream DNS Current
config.porp.stream DNS Current
configuration.porp.stream DNS Current
confluence.porp.stream DNS Current
connect.porp.stream DNS Current
console.porp.stream DNS Current
containers.porp.stream DNS Current
content.porp.stream DNS Current
corp.porp.stream DNS Current
corporate.porp.stream DNS Current
courses.porp.stream DNS Current
cpanel.porp.stream DNS Current
crl.porp.stream DNS Current
crm.porp.stream DNS Current
d.porp.stream DNS Current
dashboard.porp.stream DNS Current
data.porp.stream DNS Current
data1.porp.stream DNS Current
data2.porp.stream DNS Current
database.porp.stream DNS Current
datadog.porp.stream DNS Current
db.porp.stream DNS Current
db1.porp.stream DNS Current
db2.porp.stream DNS Current
dedicated.porp.stream DNS Current
demo.porp.stream DNS Current
deploy.porp.stream DNS Current
deployment.porp.stream DNS Current
dev.porp.stream DNS Current
dev1.porp.stream DNS Current
dev2.porp.stream DNS Current
develop.porp.stream DNS Current
developer.porp.stream DNS Current
developers.porp.stream DNS Current
devices.porp.stream DNS Current
devops.porp.stream DNS Current
directory.porp.stream DNS Current
discuss.porp.stream DNS Current
discussions.porp.stream DNS Current
dns.porp.stream DNS Current
dns1.porp.stream DNS Current
dns2.porp.stream DNS Current
dnscheck.porp.stream DNS Current
dnstool.porp.stream DNS Current
doc.porp.stream DNS Current
docker.porp.stream DNS Current
docs.porp.stream DNS Current
documentation.porp.stream DNS Current
download.porp.stream DNS Current
downloads.porp.stream DNS Current
drupal.porp.stream DNS Current
e.porp.stream DNS Current
ecommerce.porp.stream DNS Current
edge.porp.stream DNS Current
edge1.porp.stream DNS Current
edge2.porp.stream DNS Current
education.porp.stream DNS Current
elastic.porp.stream DNS Current
elasticsearch.porp.stream DNS Current
email.porp.stream DNS Current
emea.porp.stream DNS Current
endpoint.porp.stream DNS Current
erp.porp.stream DNS Current
es.porp.stream DNS Current
etl.porp.stream DNS Current
eu-west.porp.stream DNS Current
eu.porp.stream DNS Current
event.porp.stream DNS Current
events.porp.stream DNS Current
exchange.porp.stream DNS Current
ext.porp.stream DNS Current
f.porp.stream DNS Current
faq.porp.stream DNS Current
feed.porp.stream DNS Current
feedback.porp.stream DNS Current
feeds.porp.stream DNS Current
file.porp.stream DNS Current
files.porp.stream DNS Current
finance.porp.stream DNS Current
firewall.porp.stream DNS Current
forms.porp.stream DNS Current
forum.porp.stream DNS Current
forums.porp.stream DNS Current
ftp.porp.stream DNS Current
ftp1.porp.stream DNS Current
ftp2.porp.stream DNS Current
fw.porp.stream DNS Current
gateway.porp.stream DNS Current
geo.porp.stream DNS Current
gis.porp.stream DNS Current
git.porp.stream DNS Current
github.porp.stream DNS Current
gitlab.porp.stream DNS Current
go.porp.stream DNS Current
grafana.porp.stream DNS Current
graphql.porp.stream DNS Current
gw.porp.stream DNS Current
gw1.porp.stream DNS Current
gw2.porp.stream DNS Current
haproxy.porp.stream DNS Current
health.porp.stream DNS Current
healthcheck.porp.stream DNS Current
help.porp.stream DNS Current
helpdesk.porp.stream DNS Current
hiring.porp.stream DNS Current
host.porp.stream DNS Current
hosting.porp.stream DNS Current
hq.porp.stream DNS Current
hr.porp.stream DNS Current
hris.porp.stream DNS Current
hub.porp.stream DNS Current
id.porp.stream DNS Current
identity.porp.stream DNS Current
image.porp.stream DNS Current
images.porp.stream DNS Current
imap.porp.stream DNS Current
img.porp.stream DNS Current
int.porp.stream DNS Current
internal.porp.stream DNS Current
intranet.porp.stream DNS Current
inventory.porp.stream DNS Current
investor.porp.stream DNS Current
investors.porp.stream DNS Current
invoice.porp.stream DNS Current
ir.porp.stream DNS Current
it.porp.stream DNS Current
itsm.porp.stream DNS Current
itsupport.porp.stream DNS Current
jenkins.porp.stream DNS Current
jira.porp.stream DNS Current
jobs.porp.stream DNS Current
k8s.porp.stream DNS Current
kafka.porp.stream DNS Current
kb.porp.stream DNS Current
kibana.porp.stream DNS Current
kong.porp.stream DNS Current
kubernetes.porp.stream DNS Current
lab.porp.stream DNS Current
labs.porp.stream DNS Current
lan.porp.stream DNS Current
lb.porp.stream DNS Current
ldap.porp.stream DNS Current
learn.porp.stream DNS Current
learning.porp.stream DNS Current
legal.porp.stream DNS Current
link.porp.stream DNS Current
links.porp.stream DNS Current
live.porp.stream DNS Current
lms.porp.stream DNS Current
loadbalancer.porp.stream DNS Current
location.porp.stream DNS Current
log.porp.stream DNS Current
login.porp.stream DNS Current
logs.porp.stream DNS Current
lookup.porp.stream DNS Current
m.porp.stream DNS Current
mail.porp.stream DNS Current
mail1.porp.stream DNS Current
mail2.porp.stream DNS Current
mail3.porp.stream DNS Current
mailgw.porp.stream DNS Current
mailhost.porp.stream DNS Current
mailrelay.porp.stream DNS Current
mailserver.porp.stream DNS Current
manage.porp.stream DNS Current
management.porp.stream DNS Current
manager.porp.stream DNS Current
map.porp.stream DNS Current
maps.porp.stream DNS Current
marketing.porp.stream DNS Current
mdm.porp.stream DNS Current
media.porp.stream DNS Current
meet.porp.stream DNS Current
meeting.porp.stream DNS Current
memcached.porp.stream DNS Current
metrics.porp.stream DNS Current
microservices.porp.stream DNS Current
mobile.porp.stream DNS Current
mongo.porp.stream DNS Current
mongodb.porp.stream DNS Current
monitor.porp.stream DNS Current
monitoring.porp.stream DNS Current
mq.porp.stream DNS Current
mta.porp.stream DNS Current
mx.porp.stream DNS Current
mx1.porp.stream DNS Current
mx2.porp.stream DNS Current
mx3.porp.stream DNS Current
mx4.porp.stream DNS Current
mx5.porp.stream DNS Current
mxtoolbox.porp.stream DNS Current
my.porp.stream DNS Current
myaccount.porp.stream DNS Current
mysql.porp.stream DNS Current
na.porp.stream DNS Current
nagios.porp.stream DNS Current
net.porp.stream DNS Current
netadmin.porp.stream DNS Current
nettool.porp.stream DNS Current
nettools.porp.stream DNS Current
network.porp.stream DNS Current
news.porp.stream DNS Current
nginx.porp.stream DNS Current
node1.porp.stream DNS Current
node2.porp.stream DNS Current
node3.porp.stream DNS Current
notifications.porp.stream DNS Current
notify.porp.stream DNS Current
ns.porp.stream DNS Current
ns1.porp.stream DNS Current
ns2.porp.stream DNS Current
ns3.porp.stream DNS Current
ns4.porp.stream DNS Current
ns5.porp.stream DNS Current
ns6.porp.stream DNS Current
o365.porp.stream DNS Current
oauth.porp.stream DNS Current
object.porp.stream DNS Current
ocsp.porp.stream DNS Current
office.porp.stream DNS Current
okta.porp.stream DNS Current
order.porp.stream DNS Current
orders.porp.stream DNS Current
origin.porp.stream DNS Current
origin1.porp.stream DNS Current
origin2.porp.stream DNS Current
outlook.porp.stream DNS Current
owa.porp.stream DNS Current
panel.porp.stream DNS Current
partner.porp.stream DNS Current
partners.porp.stream DNS Current
pay.porp.stream DNS Current
payment.porp.stream DNS Current
payments.porp.stream DNS Current
payroll.porp.stream DNS Current
pbx.porp.stream DNS Current
phone.porp.stream DNS Current
photos.porp.stream DNS Current
pingdom.porp.stream DNS Current
pki.porp.stream DNS Current
plesk.porp.stream DNS Current
policies.porp.stream DNS Current
policy.porp.stream DNS Current
pop.porp.stream DNS Current
pop3.porp.stream DNS Current
portal.porp.stream DNS Current
portal2.porp.stream DNS Current
postgres.porp.stream DNS Current
pre.porp.stream DNS Current
preprod.porp.stream DNS Current
press.porp.stream DNS Current
preview.porp.stream DNS Current
primary.porp.stream DNS Current
print.porp.stream DNS Current
printer.porp.stream DNS Current
privacy.porp.stream DNS Current
private.porp.stream DNS Current
product.porp.stream DNS Current
products.porp.stream DNS Current
profile.porp.stream DNS Current
prometheus.porp.stream DNS Current
promo.porp.stream DNS Current
proxy.porp.stream DNS Current
proxy1.porp.stream DNS Current
proxy2.porp.stream DNS Current
public.porp.stream DNS Current
qa.porp.stream DNS Current
queue.porp.stream DNS Current
r.porp.stream DNS Current
ra.porp.stream DNS Current
rabbitmq.porp.stream DNS Current
rancher.porp.stream DNS Current
realtime.porp.stream DNS Current
recruit.porp.stream DNS Current
redirect.porp.stream DNS Current
redis.porp.stream DNS Current
register.porp.stream DNS Current
registry.porp.stream DNS Current
relay.porp.stream DNS Current
relay1.porp.stream DNS Current
releases.porp.stream DNS Current
remote.porp.stream DNS Current
repo.porp.stream DNS Current
report.porp.stream DNS Current
reporting.porp.stream DNS Current
reports.porp.stream DNS Current
repos.porp.stream DNS Current
reservations.porp.stream DNS Current
rest.porp.stream DNS Current
rss.porp.stream DNS Current
rt.porp.stream DNS Current
s3.porp.stream DNS Current
sandbox.porp.stream DNS Current
sandbox1.porp.stream DNS Current
sandbox2.porp.stream DNS Current
scan.porp.stream DNS Current
scanner.porp.stream DNS Current
schedule.porp.stream DNS Current
scp.porp.stream DNS Current
search.porp.stream DNS Current
secondary.porp.stream DNS Current
secrets.porp.stream DNS Current
secure.porp.stream DNS Current
server.porp.stream DNS Current
server1.porp.stream DNS Current
server2.porp.stream DNS Current
server3.porp.stream DNS Current
service.porp.stream DNS Current
servicedesk.porp.stream DNS Current
services.porp.stream DNS Current
sftp.porp.stream DNS Current
share.porp.stream DNS Current
shop.porp.stream DNS Current
signin.porp.stream DNS Current
signup.porp.stream DNS Current
sip.porp.stream DNS Current
slack.porp.stream DNS Current
smtp.porp.stream DNS Current
smtp1.porp.stream DNS Current
smtp2.porp.stream DNS Current
socket.porp.stream DNS Current
solr.porp.stream DNS Current
speedtest.porp.stream DNS Current
sql.porp.stream DNS Current
srv.porp.stream DNS Current
srv1.porp.stream DNS Current
srv2.porp.stream DNS Current
ssh.porp.stream DNS Current
ssl.porp.stream DNS Current
sso.porp.stream DNS Current
stage.porp.stream DNS Current
staging.porp.stream DNS Current
static.porp.stream DNS Current
static1.porp.stream DNS Current
static2.porp.stream DNS Current
statistics.porp.stream DNS Current
stats.porp.stream DNS Current
status.porp.stream DNS Current
statuspage.porp.stream DNS Current
stg.porp.stream DNS Current
storage.porp.stream DNS Current
store.porp.stream DNS Current
stream.porp.stream DNS Current
streaming.porp.stream DNS Current
support.porp.stream DNS Current
support2.porp.stream DNS Current
survey.porp.stream DNS Current
surveys.porp.stream DNS Current
svc.porp.stream DNS Current
svn.porp.stream DNS Current
swift.porp.stream DNS Current
sysadmin.porp.stream DNS Current
syslog.porp.stream DNS Current
talent.porp.stream DNS Current
teams.porp.stream DNS Current
techsupport.porp.stream DNS Current
tel.porp.stream DNS Current
telecom.porp.stream DNS Current
terms.porp.stream DNS Current
test.porp.stream DNS Current
test1.porp.stream DNS Current
test2.porp.stream DNS Current
testing.porp.stream DNS Current
ticket.porp.stream DNS Current
tickets.porp.stream DNS Current
tls.porp.stream DNS Current
tool.porp.stream DNS Current
tools.porp.stream DNS Current
trace.porp.stream DNS Current
tracing.porp.stream DNS Current
tracking.porp.stream DNS Current
training.porp.stream DNS Current
uat.porp.stream DNS Current
upload.porp.stream DNS Current
uploads.porp.stream DNS Current
uptime.porp.stream DNS Current
url.porp.stream DNS Current
us-east.porp.stream DNS Current
us-west.porp.stream DNS Current
us.porp.stream DNS Current
utility.porp.stream DNS Current
varnish.porp.stream DNS Current
vault.porp.stream DNS Current
vendor.porp.stream DNS Current
vendors.porp.stream DNS Current
video.porp.stream DNS Current
videos.porp.stream DNS Current
voip.porp.stream DNS Current
vpn.porp.stream DNS Current
vpn1.porp.stream DNS Current
vpn2.porp.stream DNS Current
vpn3.porp.stream DNS Current
vps.porp.stream DNS Current
waf.porp.stream DNS Current
wan.porp.stream DNS Current
warehouse.porp.stream DNS Current
web.porp.stream DNS Current
web1.porp.stream DNS Current
web2.porp.stream DNS Current
webapi.porp.stream DNS Current
webapp.porp.stream DNS Current
webex.porp.stream DNS Current
webhost.porp.stream DNS Current
webinar.porp.stream DNS Current
webinars.porp.stream DNS Current
webmail.porp.stream DNS Current
webproxy.porp.stream DNS Current
webserver.porp.stream DNS Current
websocket.porp.stream DNS Current
webtool.porp.stream DNS Current
webtools.porp.stream DNS Current
whm.porp.stream DNS Current
whois.porp.stream DNS Current
wiki.porp.stream DNS Current
wordpress.porp.stream DNS Current
work.porp.stream DNS Current
worker.porp.stream DNS Current
worker1.porp.stream DNS Current
worker2.porp.stream DNS Current
workspace.porp.stream DNS Current
wp.porp.stream DNS Current
ws.porp.stream DNS Current
www.porp.stream DNS Current
www1.porp.stream DNS Current
www2.porp.stream DNS Current
www3.porp.stream DNS Current
xml.porp.stream DNS Current
zabbix.porp.stream DNS Current
zoom.porp.stream DNS Current
Δ No Propagation Issues: All DNS records are synchronized between resolver and authoritative nameserver.
06 Raw records & reproducibility · L2–L3 Evidence & Verification Can another engineer reproduce every material claim? Analysis Confidence Intelligence Currency What changed Raw record diff Integrity seal Reproduce
Resolver agreement is inconsistent for some protocols, limiting confidence. Data currency and system maturity are adequate.
Accuracy 66% Currency 71/100 Maturity gold
Limiting factor: Resolver agreement is low for this scan — some protocols returned inconsistent results across resolvers
Currentness Excellent TTL Compliance Excellent Completeness Stale Source Credibility Excellent TTL Relevance Degraded
ICuAE Details
DNS data shows some aging or gaps — consider re-scanning for critical decisions

The following DNS record TTLs deviate from recommended values. Incorrect TTLs can cause caching issues, slow propagation, or unnecessary DNS traffic.

Record Type Observed TTL Typical TTL Severity Context
SOA 1108s 1 hour (3600s) medium SOA TTL is below typical — observed 1108s, typical value is 1 hour (3600s). Short TTLs increase DNS query volume but enable faster propagation. If you are preparing for a migration or need rapid failover, this may be intentional (RFC 1035 §3.2.1). For steady-state production, consider 3600 seconds per NIST SP 800-53 SI-7 relevance guidance. Use the TTL Tuner for profile-specific recommendations.
Provider Note: Cloudflare manages SOA timers automatically. Free/Pro/Business plans cannot modify SOA values. Observed TTL (1108s) is set by Cloudflare, not the zone administrator. See RFC 1912 §2.2 for recommended SOA timer values.
A 290s 1 hour (3600s) high A TTL is below typical — observed 290s, typical value is 1 hour (3600s). Short TTLs increase DNS query volume but enable faster propagation. If you are preparing for a migration or need rapid failover, this may be intentional (RFC 1035 §3.2.1). For steady-state production, consider 3600 seconds per NIST SP 800-53 SI-7 relevance guidance. Use the TTL Tuner for profile-specific recommendations.
NS 20908s 1 day (86400s) medium NS TTL is below typical — observed 20908s, typical value is 1 day (86400s). Short TTLs increase DNS query volume but enable faster propagation. If you are preparing for a migration or need rapid failover, this may be intentional (RFC 1035 §3.2.1). For steady-state production, consider 86400 seconds per NIST SP 800-53 SI-7 relevance guidance. Use the TTL Tuner for profile-specific recommendations.

Big Picture Questions

  • How often do you actually change this record? If it hasn’t changed in months, a short TTL is generating unnecessary DNS queries without any benefit.
  • Are you preparing for a migration or IP change? Short TTLs make sense temporarily — but should be raised back to 1 hour (3600s) once the change is complete.
  • Every DNS lookup adds 20–150ms of latency. With a 60s TTL, returning visitors trigger a fresh lookup every minute. With 3600s, they get cached responses for an hour — faster page loads, no extra infrastructure needed.
  • Google runs A records at ~30s because they operate a global anycast network and need to steer traffic dynamically. For a typical website without that infrastructure, copying those TTLs increases query volume with zero upside.
Tune TTL for porp.stream
Reference: NIST SP 800-53 SI-7 (Information Integrity) · RFC 8767 (Serve Stale) · RFC 1035 §3.2.1 (TTL semantics) DNS provider detected: Cloudflare — provider-specific RFC compliance notes are shown inline above where applicable.
Primary NS anita.ns.cloudflare.com
Serial 2411602186
Admin dns.cloudflare.com
Provider Cloudflare
Timer Value RFC 1912 Range
Refresh10000s1,200–43,200s (20 min – 12 hrs)
Retry2400sFraction of Refresh
Expire604800s1,209,600–2,419,200s (14–28 days)
Minimum (Neg. Cache)1800s300–86,400s (5 min – 1 day)
Expire: SOA Expire is 7 days (604800s). RFC 1912 §2.2 recommends 1,209,600–2,419,200 seconds (14–28 days). If the primary nameserver becomes unreachable, secondary nameservers will stop serving this zone after only 7 days (604800s). Cloudflare's anycast architecture reduces the practical risk, but this value departs from the RFC recommendation.

Independent RFC compliance assessment for Cloudflare. Each finding cites the specific RFC section and reports what the engineering community consensus is. We report honestly — if a provider deviates from standards, we explain what they did differently and what the RFCs actually say.

SOA Expire below RFC 1912 recommendation RFC 1912 §2.2

Cloudflare sets SOA Expire to 604,800 seconds (7 days). RFC 1912 §2.2 recommends 1,209,600–2,419,200 seconds (14–28 days). This means secondary nameservers stop serving the zone sooner if the primary becomes unreachable. Cloudflare's position is that their anycast architecture makes traditional zone transfer semantics less relevant. SOA timers are not editable on Free, Pro, or Business plans.

Below RFC recommendation
Proxied record TTLs fixed at 300s RFC 2181 §5.2

Cloudflare overrides the zone administrator's TTL to 300 seconds for all proxied (orange-cloud) records. RFC 2181 §5.2 requires TTL uniformity within an RRset but does not mandate a specific value. As the authoritative server, Cloudflare is technically within its rights, but the administrator loses TTL control. This can affect ACME DNS-01 challenges and automation workflows that depend on rapid propagation.

Technically compliant, but overrides administrator intent
Non-standard SOA serial format RFC 1912 §2.2

RFC 1912 recommends YYYYMMDDNN format for SOA serial numbers (e.g., 2026022501). Cloudflare uses a proprietary serial number format that does not encode the date. RFC 1035 only requires the serial to increment on changes, so this is compliant with the mandatory standard but breaks the convention relied on by monitoring tools.

Compliant with RFC 1035, deviates from RFC 1912 convention
Negative cache TTL delays new records RFC 2308 §5

Cloudflare's SOA MINIMUM (negative cache TTL) is 1,800–3,600 seconds (30–60 minutes). This controls how long resolvers cache NXDOMAIN responses. Newly created DNS records — including ACME DNS-01 challenge TXT records for Let's Encrypt — may be invisible for up to 1 hour even after creation. This causes certificate issuance failures for automation tools like cert-manager and Traefik. Workaround: pre-create placeholder records before they're needed. This is RFC-compliant but aggressive compared to the 300–900 seconds common at other providers.

RFC-compliant, but causes real-world automation failures
Historical RFC 2181 §5.2 violation: TTL mismatch in CNAME RRsets RFC 2181 §5.2

In February 2022, Cloudflare's resolver (1.1.1.1) returned CNAME responses with mismatched TTLs within the same RRset — including cases where one TTL was zero and another was non-zero. RFC 2181 §5.2 explicitly states: 'the TTLs of all RRs in an RRSet must be the same.' systemd-resolved (used by Arch Linux, Ubuntu, Fedora, and most modern Linux distributions) correctly rejected these responses per the RFC, causing widespread DNS resolution failures. Cloudflare acknowledged the issue and it appears to have been fixed, but it demonstrated that Cloudflare's DNS infrastructure can deviate from RFC requirements in ways that break compliant resolver implementations.

Was a documented RFC violation — appears resolved
This assessment is based on RFC specifications, provider documentation, and documented incidents from DNS engineering communities. DNS Tool does not have a commercial relationship with any provider listed.
DNS Intelligence What does DNS look like right now — and what changed over time?
DNS Evidence Diff Side-by-side comparison
Resolver Records (Public DNS cache)
Authoritative Records (Source of truth)
A Synchronized 1 / 1 records
198.72.98.27
198.72.98.27
AAAA 0 / 0 records
No records
No records
CAA RFC 8659 §4 0 / 0 records
No records
No records
MX RFC 5321 0 / 0 records
No records
No records
NS RFC 1035 Synchronized 2 / 2 records
anita.ns.cloudflare.com.
anita.ns.cloudflare.com.
margo.ns.cloudflare.com.
margo.ns.cloudflare.com.
SOA RFC 1035 Synchronized 1 / 1 records
anita.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2411602186 10000 2400 604800 1800
anita.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2411602186 10000 2400 604800 1800
TXT RFC 7208 §4 0 / 0 records
No records
No records
DNS History Timeline BETA
Your key is sent directly to SecurityTrails and is never stored on our servers. Get an API key
DNS History Timeline BETA

When was a record added, removed, or changed — and could that change be the problem?

Confirm Your Email Configuration

This tool analyzes DNS records, but to verify actual email delivery, send a test email to Red Sift Investigate. Their tool shows exactly how your emails arrive, including SPF/DKIM/DMARC pass/fail results in the headers.

DATA FRESHNESS & METHODOLOGY

All security-critical records (SPF, DMARC, DKIM, DANE/TLSA, DNSSEC, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, BIMI, CAA) are queried live from authoritative nameservers and cross-referenced against 5 independent public DNS resolvers (Cloudflare, Google, Quad9, OpenDNS, DNS4EU) at the time of each analysis. No security verdict uses cached data.

Registrar data (RDAP) is cached for up to 24 hours because domain ownership and registration details change infrequently. Certificate Transparency logs (subdomain discovery via RFC 6962) are cached for 1 hour because CT entries are append-only historical records. Sections using cached data are marked with a CACHED badge; live queries show LIVE.

Intelligence Sources

This analysis used 4 DNS resolvers (consensus), reverse DNS (PTR), Team Cymru (ASN attribution), IANA RDAP (registrar), crt.sh (CT logs), and SMTP probing (transport). All using open-standard protocols.

Full List
Verify Report Integrity SHA-3-512 Has this report been altered since generation? Verify below

This cryptographic hash seals the analysis data, domain, timestamp, and tool version into a tamper-evident fingerprint. Any modification to the report data will produce a different hash. This is distinct from the posture hash (used for drift detection) — the integrity hash uniquely identifies this specific report instance.

5b4b7dbc8728617dfe7c3955be06a30270b2e3289fff37305c286e8ed622e12947300ee70475265fe2d5b566e2450c7ff4d1b10172d6939cec72b6822065d853
Evaluations reference 12 RFCs. Methods are reproducible using the verification commands provided. Results reflect DNS state at 12 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC.

Download the intelligence dump and verify its integrity, like you would a Kali ISO or any critical artifact. The SHA-3-512 checksum covers every byte of the download — deterministic serialization ensures identical hashes across downloads.

After downloading, verify with any of these commands:

Tip: cd ~/Downloads first (or wherever you saved the files).

OpenSSL + Sidecar (macOS, Linux, WSL)
cat dns-intelligence-porp.stream.json.sha3 && echo '---' && openssl dgst -sha3-512 dns-intelligence-porp.stream.json
Python 3 (cross-platform)
python3 -c "import hashlib; print(hashlib.sha3_512(open('dns-intelligence-porp.stream.json','rb').read()).hexdigest())"
sha3sum (coreutils 9+)
sha3sum -a 512 dns-intelligence-porp.stream.json
Compare the output against the .sha3 file or the checksum API at /api/analysis/18265/checksum. Hash algorithm: SHA-3-512 (Keccak, NIST FIPS 202).

Every finding in this report is backed by DNS queries you can run yourself. These vetted one-liners reproduce the exact checks used to build this report for porp.stream. Our analysis adds multi-resolver consensus, RFC-based evaluation, and cross-referencing — but the underlying data is always independently verifiable. We are intelligence analysts, not gatekeepers.

DNS Records

Query A records (IPv4) RFC 1035
dig +noall +answer porp.stream A
Query AAAA records (IPv6) RFC 1035
dig +noall +answer porp.stream AAAA
Query MX records (mail servers) RFC 1035
dig +noall +answer porp.stream MX
Query NS records (nameservers) RFC 1035
dig +noall +answer porp.stream NS
Query TXT records RFC 1035
dig +noall +answer porp.stream TXT

Email Authentication

Check SPF record RFC 7208
dig +short porp.stream TXT | grep -i spf
Check DMARC policy RFC 7489
dig +short _dmarc.porp.stream TXT
Check DKIM key for selector 'default' RFC 6376
dig +short default._domainkey.porp.stream TXT
Check DKIM key for selector 'google' RFC 6376
dig +short google._domainkey.porp.stream TXT
Check DKIM key for selector 'selector1' RFC 6376
dig +short selector1._domainkey.porp.stream TXT
Check DKIM key for selector 'selector2' RFC 6376
dig +short selector2._domainkey.porp.stream TXT

Domain Security

Check DNSSEC DNSKEY records RFC 4035
dig +dnssec +noall +answer porp.stream DNSKEY
Check DNSSEC DS records RFC 4035
dig +noall +answer porp.stream DS
Validate DNSSEC chain (requires DNSSEC-validating resolver) RFC 4035
dig +dnssec +cd porp.stream A @1.1.1.1

Transport Security

Check TLSA record (replace MX_HOST with actual MX) RFC 7672
dig +noall +answer _25._tcp.MX_HOST TLSA
Check MTA-STS DNS record RFC 8461
dig +short _mta-sts.porp.stream TXT
Fetch MTA-STS policy file RFC 8461
curl -sL https://mta-sts.porp.stream/.well-known/mta-sts.txt
Check TLS-RPT record RFC 8460
dig +short _smtp._tls.porp.stream TXT

Brand & Trust

Check BIMI record BIMI Draft
dig +short default._bimi.porp.stream TXT
Check CAA records (certificate authority authorization) RFC 8659
dig +noall +answer porp.stream CAA

DNS Records

Check HTTPS/SVCB records RFC 9460
dig +noall +answer porp.stream HTTPS

Domain Security

Check CDS/CDNSKEY automation records RFC 7344
dig +noall +answer porp.stream CDS

Infrastructure Intelligence

RDAP domain registration lookup RFC 9083
curl -sL 'https://rdap.org/domain/porp.stream' | python3 -m json.tool | head -50
Search Certificate Transparency logs RFC 6962
curl -s 'https://crt.sh/?q=%25.porp.stream&output=json' | python3 -c "import json,sys; [print(e['name_value']) for e in json.load(sys.stdin)]" | sort -u | head -20
Check security.txt RFC 9116
curl -sL https://porp.stream/.well-known/security.txt | head -20

AI Surface

Check for llms.txt
curl -sI https://porp.stream/llms.txt | head -5
Check robots.txt for AI crawler rules
curl -s https://porp.stream/robots.txt | grep -i -E 'GPTBot|ChatGPT|Claude|Anthropic|Google-Extended|CCBot|PerplexityBot'

Infrastructure Intelligence

ASN lookup for 198.72.98.27 (Team Cymru)
dig +short 27.98.72.198.origin.asn.cymru.com TXT
Commands use dig, openssl, and curl — standard tools available on macOS, Linux, and WSL. Results may vary slightly due to DNS propagation timing and resolver caching.
Intelligence Confidence Audit Engine gold · 9/9 Evaluated
How confident are these results? Each protocol is independently verified against RFC standards. No self-awarded badges.
SPF
Gold 15673 runs
DKIM
Gold 15463 runs
DMARC
Gold 15654 runs
DANE/TLSA
Gold 15445 runs
DNSSEC
Gold 15632 runs
BIMI
Gold 15460 runs
MTA-STS
Gold 15481 runs
TLS-RPT
Gold 15496 runs
CAA
Gold 15493 runs
Maturity: Development Verified Consistent Gold Gold Master

0s

Running Real-Time Scan Telemetry

Most scans complete in less than one minute. Some may take longer.

Markers represent known resolver locations. Anycast routing selects the nearest node — exact routing is internal to each provider.

Pipeline nodes reflect live data as each analysis phase completes.

Telemetry Log 0 polls