Skip to main content
Registry Zone Health Intelligencetest is a shared registry suffix.
This report focuses on zone infrastructure health: DNSSEC signing, nameserver diversity, certificate authority policy, and delegation security. Email authentication protocols (SPF, DMARC, DKIM) are not applicable to registry suffixes — they apply to domains registered under this zone.
Registry operators, ICANN, and ccTLD authorities can use this view to assess zone security posture.

Registry Zone Health Report

test
20 Apr 2026, 03:58 UTC · 3.8s ·v26.46.24 · SHA-3-512: 3160✱✱✱✱ Verify ·Archived ·Cross-Referenced
Recon ModeRecon Mode Snapshot Re-analyze New Domain
Footprint
Significant disagreement between resolvers undermines confidence in the analysis results.
Accuracy 23% Currency 63/100 Maturity consistent
Limiting factor: Resolver agreement is low for this scan — some protocols returned inconsistent results across resolvers
Currentness Excellent TTL Compliance Adequate Completeness Stale Source Credibility Excellent TTL Relevance Adequate
ICuAE Details
DNS data shows some aging or gaps — consider re-scanning for critical decisions

The following DNS record TTLs deviate from recommended values. Incorrect TTLs can cause caching issues, slow propagation, or unnecessary DNS traffic.

Record Type Observed TTL Typical TTL Severity Context
SOA 3 hours (10800s) 1 hour (3600s) medium SOA TTL is above typical — observed 3 hours (10800s), typical value is 1 hour (3600s). Long TTLs reduce DNS query volume but slow propagation when records change. Consider 3600 seconds for a balance of performance and flexibility per NIST SP 800-53 SI-7 relevance guidance.
NS 10762s 1 day (86400s) medium NS TTL is below typical — observed 10762s, typical value is 1 day (86400s). Short TTLs increase DNS query volume but enable faster propagation. If you are preparing for a migration or need rapid failover, this may be intentional (RFC 1035 §3.2.1). For steady-state production, consider 86400 seconds per NIST SP 800-53 SI-7 relevance guidance. Use the TTL Tuner for profile-specific recommendations.

Big Picture Questions

  • How often do you actually change this record? If it hasn’t changed in months, a short TTL is generating unnecessary DNS queries without any benefit.
  • Are you preparing for a migration or IP change? Short TTLs make sense temporarily — but should be raised back to 1 hour (3600s) once the change is complete.
  • Every DNS lookup adds 20–150ms of latency. With a 60s TTL, returning visitors trigger a fresh lookup every minute. With 3600s, they get cached responses for an hour — faster page loads, no extra infrastructure needed.
  • Google runs A records at ~30s because they operate a global anycast network and need to steer traffic dynamically. For a typical website without that infrastructure, copying those TTLs increases query volume with zero upside.
Tune TTL for test
Reference: NIST SP 800-53 SI-7 (Information Integrity) · RFC 8767 (Serve Stale) · RFC 1035 §3.2.1 (TTL semantics)
Primary NS localhost
Serial 1
Admin nobody.invalid
Provider Unknown
Timer Value RFC 1912 Range
Refresh600s1,200–43,200s (20 min – 12 hrs)
Retry1200sFraction of Refresh
Expire604800s1,209,600–2,419,200s (14–28 days)
Minimum (Neg. Cache)10800s300–86,400s (5 min – 1 day)
Expire: SOA Expire is 7 days (604800s). RFC 1912 §2.2 recommends 1,209,600–2,419,200 seconds (14–28 days). If the primary nameserver becomes unreachable, secondary nameservers will stop serving this zone after only 7 days (604800s).
Refresh: SOA Refresh is 10 minutes (600s), below the RFC 1912 recommended minimum of 1,200 seconds.
Registry Zone Health
DNSSEC: Warning 1 Nameservers
Zone infrastructure protocols applicable to registry suffixes
Email Spoofing
N/A — Registry
Brand Impersonation
N/A — Registry
DNS Tampering
Unsigned
Certificate Control
N/A — Registry
Not Configured
DNSSEC
Priority Action Achievable posture: Secure
Medium Enable DNSSEC

DNSSEC is not enabled for this domain. DNSSEC provides cryptographic authentication of DNS responses, preventing cache poisoning and DNS spoofing attacks.

Registrar (RDAP) LIVE
Unknown
Where domain was purchased
Email Service Provider
Unknown
Unprotected
Web Hosting
Unknown
Where website is hosted
DNS Hosting
Unknown
Where DNS records are edited


DNS Server Security Hardened

No DNS server misconfigurations found on localhost — Nmap NSE probes for zone transfer (AXFR), open recursion (RFC 5358), nameserver identity disclosure, and DNS cache snooping.

Check Result Detail
Zone Transfer (AXFR) Denied Zone transfer denied (correct configuration)
Open Recursion Disabled Recursion disabled (correct configuration)
Nameserver Identity Hidden No nameserver identity information disclosed
Cache Snooping Protected Cache snooping not possible (correct configuration)

Tested nameserver: localhost

Delegation Consistency 2 Issues

Delegation consistency: 2 issue(s) found — Parent/child NS delegation alignment: DS↔DNSKEY, glue records, TTL drift, SOA serial sync.

Findings:
  • Could not retrieve NS TTL from either parent or child
  • Could not retrieve SOA serial from any nameserver

DS ↔ DNSKEY Alignment Aligned

Glue Record Completeness Complete

NameserverIn-BailiwickIPv4 GlueIPv6 GlueStatus
localhost No N/A N/A OK

NS TTL Comparison Drift

Drift: 0s

SOA Serial Consistency Consistent

Nameserver Fleet Matrix 3 Issues

Analyzed 1 nameserver(s) for test — Per-nameserver reachability, ASN diversity, SOA serial sync, and lame delegation checks.

Findings:
  • localhost: UDP unreachable on port 53
  • localhost: TCP unreachable on port 53
  • Low nameserver diversity — all nameservers in a single ASN/prefix
Nameserver IPv4 IPv6 ASN / Operator UDP TCP AA SOA Serial
localhost 127.0.0.1 ::1 N/A
Unique ASNs
0
Unique Operators
0
Unique /24 Prefixes
1
Diversity Score
Poor

All 1 nameservers in a single ASN and /24 prefix — single point of failure risk


Zone Signing & DNSSEC Methodology Is this zone cryptographically signed? Possible DNSSEC is not deployed, DNS responses are not cryptographically verified

DNSSEC RFC 4033 §2 Consistent Unsigned

DNSSEC not configured - DNS responses are unsigned

Domain does not use DNSSEC. Enable in your registrar's DNS settings (look for "DNSSEC" or "DS records" section).

NS Delegation Verified

1 nameserver(s) configured

Nameservers: localhost
Multi-Resolver Verification Recon: Consensus reached - 5 resolvers (Cloudflare, Google, Quad9, OpenDNS, DNS4EU) agree on DNS records
Subdomain Discovery Not Applicable
Certificate Transparency subdomain enumeration is not applicable for registry suffixes. For test, CT logs would show registered domains under this zone rather than organizational subdomains. To analyze a specific domain's exposure, scan a registrable domain like example.test.
Δ No Propagation Issues: All DNS records are synchronized between resolver and authoritative nameserver.
DNS Intelligence What does DNS look like right now — and what changed over time?
DNS Evidence Diff Side-by-side comparison
Resolver Records (Public DNS cache)
Authoritative Records (Source of truth)
A 0 / 0 records
No records
No records
AAAA 0 / 0 records
No records
No records
CAA RFC 8659 §4 0 / 0 records
No records
No records
MX RFC 5321 0 / 0 records
No records
No records
NS RFC 1035 1 / 0 records
localhost.
SOA RFC 1035 1 / 0 records
localhost. nobody.invalid. 1 600 1200 604800 10800
TXT RFC 7208 §4 0 / 0 records
No records
No records
DNS History Timeline BETA

When was a record added, removed, or changed — and could that change be the problem?

Analyze Another Domain

DATA FRESHNESS & METHODOLOGY

All security-critical records (SPF, DMARC, DKIM, DANE/TLSA, DNSSEC, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, BIMI, CAA) are queried live from authoritative nameservers and cross-referenced against 5 independent public DNS resolvers (Cloudflare, Google, Quad9, OpenDNS, DNS4EU) at the time of each analysis. No security verdict uses cached data.

Registrar data (RDAP) is cached for up to 24 hours because domain ownership and registration details change infrequently. Certificate Transparency logs (subdomain discovery via RFC 6962) are cached for 1 hour because CT entries are append-only historical records. Sections using cached data are marked with a CACHED badge; live queries show LIVE.

Intelligence Sources

This analysis used 4 DNS resolvers (consensus), reverse DNS (PTR), Team Cymru (ASN attribution), IANA RDAP (registrar), crt.sh (CT logs), and SMTP probing (transport). All using open-standard protocols.

Full List
Verify Report Integrity SHA-3-512 Has this report been altered since generation? Verify below

This cryptographic hash seals the analysis data, domain, timestamp, and tool version into a tamper-evident fingerprint. Any modification to the report data will produce a different hash. This is distinct from the posture hash (used for drift detection) — the integrity hash uniquely identifies this specific report instance.

3160a364bc6f396f65c40128879a72cf79ae88db153f5f088df7757cedc082bee3fb8cd92f7d232a751fdb7550f146a9c851cb5c6743071bfcd544fd5e61877d
Evaluations reference 12 RFCs. Methods are reproducible using the verification commands provided. Results reflect DNS state at 20 Apr 2026, 03:58 UTC.
Internet Archive — Permanent Record Wayback Machine Can this analysis be independently verified? Archived

This analysis has been automatically submitted to the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine, creating a tamper-evident, third-party-hosted snapshot of the DNS security posture at analysis time. This archived copy is independent of DNS Tool — it provides an independently verifiable record of the analysis at this point in time. Combined with the SHA-3-512 integrity hash, this creates a verifiable chain of evidence for domain security state.

Snapshot preserved at https://web.archive.org/web/20260420035802/https://dnstool.it-help.tech/analysis/14480/view/E

Download the intelligence dump and verify its integrity, like you would a Kali ISO or any critical artifact. The SHA-3-512 checksum covers every byte of the download — deterministic serialization ensures identical hashes across downloads.

After downloading, verify with any of these commands:

Tip: cd ~/Downloads first (or wherever you saved the files).

OpenSSL + Sidecar (macOS, Linux, WSL)
cat dns-intelligence-test.json.sha3 && echo '---' && openssl dgst -sha3-512 dns-intelligence-test.json
Python 3 (cross-platform)
python3 -c "import hashlib; print(hashlib.sha3_512(open('dns-intelligence-test.json','rb').read()).hexdigest())"
sha3sum (coreutils 9+)
sha3sum -a 512 dns-intelligence-test.json
Compare the output against the .sha3 file or the checksum API at /api/analysis/14480/checksum. Hash algorithm: SHA-3-512 (Keccak, NIST FIPS 202).

Every finding in this report is backed by DNS queries you can run yourself. These vetted one-liners reproduce the exact checks used to build this report for test. Our analysis adds multi-resolver consensus, RFC-based evaluation, and cross-referencing — but the underlying data is always independently verifiable. We are intelligence analysts, not gatekeepers.

DNS Records

Query A records (IPv4) RFC 1035
dig +noall +answer test A
Query AAAA records (IPv6) RFC 1035
dig +noall +answer test AAAA
Query MX records (mail servers) RFC 1035
dig +noall +answer test MX
Query NS records (nameservers) RFC 1035
dig +noall +answer test NS
Query TXT records RFC 1035
dig +noall +answer test TXT

Domain Security

Check DNSSEC DNSKEY records RFC 4035
dig +dnssec +noall +answer test DNSKEY
Check DNSSEC DS records RFC 4035
dig +noall +answer test DS
Validate DNSSEC chain (requires DNSSEC-validating resolver) RFC 4035
dig +dnssec +cd test A @1.1.1.1

Brand & Trust

Check CAA records (certificate authority authorization) RFC 8659
dig +noall +answer test CAA

DNS Records

Check HTTPS/SVCB records RFC 9460
dig +noall +answer test HTTPS

Domain Security

Check CDS/CDNSKEY automation records RFC 7344
dig +noall +answer test CDS

Infrastructure Intelligence

RDAP domain registration lookup RFC 9083
curl -sL 'https://rdap.org/domain/test' | python3 -m json.tool | head -50
Commands use dig, openssl, and curl — standard tools available on macOS, Linux, and WSL. Results may vary slightly due to DNS propagation timing and resolver caching.
Intelligence Confidence Audit Engine consistent · 9/9 Evaluated
How confident are these results? Each protocol is independently verified against RFC standards. No self-awarded badges.
SPF
Consistent 15107 runs
DKIM
Consistent 14884 runs
DMARC
Consistent 15088 runs
DANE/TLSA
Consistent 14866 runs
DNSSEC
Consistent 15065 runs
BIMI
Consistent 14881 runs
MTA-STS
Consistent 14902 runs
TLS-RPT
Consistent 14917 runs
CAA
Consistent 14914 runs
Maturity: Development Verified Consistent Gold Gold Master

0s

Running Real-Time Scan Telemetry

Most scans complete in less than one minute. Some may take longer.

Markers represent known resolver locations. Anycast routing selects the nearest node — exact routing is internal to each provider.

Pipeline nodes reflect live data as each analysis phase completes.

Telemetry Log 0 polls