Executive's DNS Intelligence Brief
TLP:AMBER
Limited disclosure — recipients may share within their organization only
DNS Security & Trust Posture
Risk Level:
High Risk
6 protocols configured, 3 not configured
2 recommendations
Analysis Confidence
MODERATE
Resolver agreement is inconsistent for some protocols, limiting confidence. Data currency and system maturity are adequate.
Email Spoofing
Partial
Brand Impersonation
Not Set Up
DNS Tampering
Protected
Certificate Control
Configured
What Requires Attention
Recommended
Move DMARC policy from 'none' to 'quarantine' or 'reject'
Recommended
Enable DMARC aggregate reporting (rua) for authentication visibility
The BIG Questions
Can this domain be impersonated by email?
Yes
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
Can DNS itself be tampered with?
No
DNSSEC signed and validated, cryptographic chain of trust verified
Can this brand be convincingly faked?
Likely
DMARC is monitor-only p=none (RFC 7489 §6.3) — spoofed mail is not blocked, brand faking is trivial
Is mail transport encryption enforced?
Yes
DANE/TLSA provides cryptographic transport verification
Is certificate issuance controlled?
Yes
CAA records restrict which certificate authorities may issue certificates
Does this domain publish AI agent instructions?
No
No llms.txt file detected — AI models have no structured instructions for this domain
Is AI crawling of our content controlled?
No
robots.txt present but does not block AI crawlers — content may be freely scraped
Has someone manipulated AI recommendations about us?
No
No indicators of AI recommendation manipulation found
Are there hidden AI prompts on our site?
No
No hidden prompt artifacts found in page source
Domain Overview
Registrar
Gandi SAS
Email Provider
Unknown
Web Hosting
Unknown
DNS Hosting
Unknown
Technical Findings
Email Authentication
Can this domain be impersonated by email?
Yes
— DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
SPF (Sender Policy)
Configured
DMARC (Policy)
Partial
Policy: none
Monitor Only
DKIM (Signatures)
Configured
Mail Posture
Moderately Protected
Mail Transport Security
Is mail transport encryption enforced?
Yes
— DANE/TLSA provides cryptographic transport verification
MTA-STS
Partial
DANE / TLSA
Not Configured
TLS-RPT (Reporting)
Not Configured
Mail Transport
Enforced
Policy-assessed
2 probes
DNS Security
Can DNS itself be tampered with?
No
— DNSSEC signed and validated, cryptographic chain of trust verified
DNSSEC
Signed & Validated
DNSSEC fully configured and validated — AD (Authenticated Data) flag set by resolver 8.8.8.8 confirming cryptographic chain of trust from root to zone (RFC 4035 §3.2.3)
NS Delegation
Healthy
Enterprise DNS (Mixed Configuration)
Delegation Consistency
4 Issues
NS Fleet Health
Healthy
Diversity: Good
DNSSEC Operations
1 Issue
2 keys, 0 sigs
Brand & Certificate Controls
Can this brand be convincingly faked?
Likely
— DMARC is monitor-only p=none (RFC 7489 §6.3) — spoofed mail is not blocked, brand faking is trivial
Is certificate issuance controlled?
Yes
— CAA records restrict which certificate authorities may issue certificates
BIMI (Brand Logo)
Not Configured
CAA (Certificate)
Configured
AI Surface Scanner Scanned
Does this domain publish AI agent instructions?
No
— No llms.txt file detected — AI models have no structured instructions for this domain
Is AI crawling of our content controlled?
No
— robots.txt present but does not block AI crawlers — content may be freely scraped
Has someone manipulated AI recommendations about us?
No
— No indicators of AI recommendation manipulation found
Are there hidden AI prompts on our site?
No
— No hidden prompt artifacts found in page source
LLM Context File
Not Found
No llms.txt file detected
AI Crawler Governance
Not Blocking
No AI crawler restrictions found in robots.txt
Poisoning Indicators
None Found
No AI recommendation poisoning indicators detected
Hidden Prompt Artifacts
None Found
No hidden prompt artifacts detected
Public Exposure
Clear
No secrets detected in publicly accessible source
Priority Actions 4 total Achievable: Low Risk
High
Upgrade DMARC from p=none
Your DMARC policy is monitor-only (p=none). Upgrade to p=quarantine or p=reject after reviewing reports to actively prevent spoofing.
Medium
Add DMARC Aggregate Reporting
Add a rua= tag to receive aggregate DMARC reports. Without reporting, you cannot monitor authentication failures.
Low
Add TLS-RPT Reporting
Your domain has DNSSEC + DANE — the strongest email transport security available. TLS-RPT (TLS Reporting) sends you reports about TLS connection failures when other servers try to deliver mail to your domain.
Low
Deploy MTA-STS
MTA-STS enforces TLS encryption for inbound mail delivery, preventing downgrade attacks on your mail transport.
Appendix — Additional Resources
Full technical details including raw DNS records, DKIM public keys, IP/ASN mappings, resolver consensus evidence, and verification commands are available in the Engineer's DNS Intelligence Report.
Verify Report Integrity SHA-3-512 Has this report been tampered with? Verify below
Tamper-evident fingerprint binding this analysis to its data, domain, timestamp, and tool version.
979d2a5ed02d47a3159fa233a79b59440412b724f71b3ff93965cbb95703b2a27dbd9c10621a33e1989081dbff78fb9bfdaa3d9cb8a3d4223e1c80c5449872aa
12 RFCs evaluated · DNS state at 20 Mar 2026, 08:31 UTC
Internet Archive — Permanent Record Wayback Machine
This analysis is permanently archived by the Internet Archive, providing independent third-party verification of DNS security posture at analysis time.
View Archived Snapshot