Recon Report
github.com
Target Assessment
Target Hardness:
Medium Risk
4 defensive layers
|
4 attack surface gaps
1 weakness
1 monitoring
ANALYSIS CONFIDENCE
MODERATE
71/100
ACC:66%
CUR:76
MAT:verified
Email Spoofability Can you spoof email from this domain? Yes DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
> analyzing sender authorization policy...
SPF — Sender Policy Framework
SPF is configured — sender authorization restricts spoofing
RFC 7208 — Sender Policy Framework
SPF allows domain owners to specify which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of their domain. Without SPF, any server can forge the envelope sender.
> enumerating cryptographic selectors...
DKIM — DomainKeys Identified Mail
DKIM selectors reveal mail infrastructure
— signatures found
RFC 6376 — DomainKeys Identified Mail
DKIM provides cryptographic authentication of email messages. Selector names often reveal email providers (e.g., google, selector1 = Microsoft 365).
> evaluating enforcement policy...
DMARC — Domain-based Message Authentication
DMARC p=none — monitoring only, no enforcement. Spoofing is trivial.
RFC 7489 — DMARC
DMARC ties SPF and DKIM together with a policy that tells receiving servers what to do with unauthenticated mail. p=none is monitoring only — attackers love it.
Transport Security Can you intercept email in transit? No No MTA-STS or DANE — mail transport encryption is opportunistic only
> probing certificate pinning via DNSSEC chain...
DANE / TLSA
No DANE — TLS is opportunistic and can be downgraded
MTA-STS
MTA-STS not enforced — STARTTLS stripping possible
TLS-RPT
No TLS-RPT — TLS failures go unnoticed by the domain owner
RFC 8460 — SMTP TLS Reporting
TLS-RPT enables reporting of TLS negotiation failures. Without it, STARTTLS downgrade attacks leave no trace.
Brand & Certificate Security Can you fake this brand's identity? Likely DMARC is monitor-only p=none (RFC 7489 §6.3) — spoofed mail is not blocked, brand faking is trivial
BIMI
No BIMI — no verified brand logo in email clients. Visual impersonation is easy.
CAA — Certificate Authority Authorization
CAA restricts certificate issuance to authorized CAs. Attacker must compromise an approved CA or exploit issuance delay windows.
0 issuewild "sectigo.com"
0 issuewild "digicert.com"
0 issue "sectigo.com"
0 issue "letsencrypt.org"
0 issue "digicert.com"
0 issue "globalsign.com"
0 issuewild "letsencrypt.org"
RFC 8659 — CAA
CAA records specify which Certificate Authorities are authorized to issue certificates. Without CAA, an attacker could obtain a valid cert from any CA.
DNS Infrastructure Can you poison the DNS? Possible DNSSEC is not deployed, DNS responses are not cryptographically verified
> validating cryptographic chain of trust...
DNSSEC
No DNSSEC — DNS responses can be spoofed or poisoned
RFC 4033–4035 — DNSSEC
DNSSEC adds cryptographic signatures to DNS responses, preventing cache poisoning and response forgery. Without DNSSEC, an attacker can forge DNS answers.
NS Delegation
8 nameservers detected
dns1.p08.nsone.net
dns2.p08.nsone.net
dns3.p08.nsone.net
dns4.p08.nsone.net
ns-1283.awsdns-32.org
ns-1707.awsdns-21.co.uk
ns-421.awsdns-52.com
ns-520.awsdns-01.net
Attack Surface Discovery What can you find from the outside?
Subdomain Discovery (Multi-Source)
0 subdomains discovered via CT logs + DNS probing + Nmap SAN extraction
| Subdomain |
|---|
map[cert_count:5 cname_target:glb-2a3c35-public-internal.githubapp.com first_seen:2025-05-14 is_current:true issuers:[Sectigo Limited Let's Encrypt] name:admin.github.com source:dns] |
map[cert_count:5 first_seen:2025-05-14 is_current:true issuers:[Sectigo Limited Let's Encrypt] name:api.github.com source:dns] |
map[cert_count:1 cname_target:glb-db52c2cf8be544.github.com first_seen:2025-08-22T00:00:00 is_current:true issuers:[DigiCert Inc] name:api.mcp.github.com source:ct] |
map[cert_count:1 cname_target:glb-db52c2cf8be544.github.com first_seen:2025-07-31T00:00:00 is_current:true issuers:[DigiCert Inc] name:api.security.github.com source:ct] |
map[cert_count:4 cname_target:github.github.io first_seen:2026-03-10T05:45:11 is_current:true issuers:[Let's Encrypt] name:asset-generator.github.com source:ct] |
map[cert_count:5 cname_target:autodiscover.outlook.com first_seen:2025-05-14 is_current:true issuers:[Sectigo Limited Let's Encrypt] name:autodiscover.github.com source:dns] |
map[cert_count:2 cname_target:github.github.io first_seen:2026-03-08T21:06:39 is_current:true issuers:[Let's Encrypt] name:awesome-copilot.github.com source:ct] |
map[cert_count:5 cname_target:github.github.io first_seen:2025-05-14 is_current:true issuers:[Sectigo Limited Let's Encrypt] name:blog.github.com source:dns] |
map[cert_count:4 cname_target:github.github.io first_seen:2026-03-08T13:45:40 is_current:true issuers:[Let's Encrypt] name:bug-bash.github.com source:ct] |
map[cert_count:5 cname_target:d24z2fz21y4fag.cloudfront.net first_seen:2025-05-14 is_current:true issuers:[Sectigo Limited Let's Encrypt] name:cloud.github.com source:dns] |
map[cert_count:2 cname_target:communication.github.com.cname.campaign.adobe.com first_seen:2025-06-19T00:00:00 is_current:true issuers:[DigiCert Inc] name:communication.github.com source:ct] |
map[cert_count:5 cname_target:redirect.github.com first_seen:2025-05-14 is_current:true issuers:[Sectigo Limited Let's Encrypt] name:community.github.com source:dns] |
map[cert_count:5 cname_target:github.github.io first_seen:2025-05-14 is_current:true issuers:[Sectigo Limited Let's Encrypt] name:developer.github.com source:dns] |
map[cert_count:5 cname_target:github.github.io first_seen:2025-05-14 is_current:true issuers:[Sectigo Limited Let's Encrypt] name:developers.github.com source:dns] |
map[cert_count:5 first_seen:2025-05-14 is_current:true issuers:[Sectigo Limited Let's Encrypt] name:docs.github.com source:dns] |
map[cert_count:2 first_seen:2026-02-14T17:51:09 is_current:true issuers:[Let's Encrypt] name:ducky.github.com source:ct] |
map[cert_count:5 cname_target:glb-db52c2cf8be544.github.com first_seen:2025-05-14 is_current:true issuers:[Sectigo Limited Let's Encrypt] name:education.github.com source:dns] |
map[cert_count:2 cname_target:mkto-sj180011.com first_seen:2025-07-06T00:00:00 is_current:true issuers:[Sectigo Limited] name:emails.github.com source:ct] |
map[cert_count:8 cname_target:gh-cert-registration-s-uat.azurewebsites.net first_seen:2025-09-05T00:00:00 is_current:true issuers:[Sectigo Limited] name:examadmin-uat.github.com source:ct] |
map[cert_count:4 first_seen:2025-09-08T00:00:00 is_current:true issuers:[Sectigo Limited] name:examadmin.github.com source:ct] |
SaaS Services (TXT Record Discovery)
10 SaaS services detected via DNS TXT verification records
Loom
Google Workspace
Adobe
Microsoft 365
Stripe
Miro
Atlassian
Facebook / Meta
DocuSign
Apple
Secret Exposure
No exposed secrets detected in common paths
Intelligence Metadata Can you verify this independently?
SHA-3-512 Integrity Hash
1b8147705350a1716ff9d4d852a89580868bdd65b3f1c75e2d43cd2ddbeabf2872f478d5e7077a6d8435e3d0f867a4f50188f692c4c054692c0d229fa121d2bb
RFC References
12
Tool Version
v26.38.01
Posture Hash
4f27409bf8c18c97…