Skip to main content

Recon Report

hak5.org
24 Feb 2026, 22:47 UTC · 22.9s ·v26.25.82
Target Assessment
Target Hardness: Medium Risk
4 defensive layers | 4 attack surface gaps
1 weakness 2 monitoring
Email Spoofability Can you spoof email from this domain? Yes DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
> analyzing sender authorization policy...
SPF — Sender Policy Framework
SPF is configured — sender authorization restricts spoofing
RFC 7208 — Sender Policy Framework

SPF allows domain owners to specify which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of their domain. Without SPF, any server can forge the envelope sender.

> enumerating cryptographic selectors...
DKIM — DomainKeys Identified Mail
DKIM selectors reveal mail infrastructure — partial coverage
RFC 6376 — DomainKeys Identified Mail

DKIM provides cryptographic authentication of email messages. Selector names often reveal email providers (e.g., google, selector1 = Microsoft 365).

> evaluating enforcement policy...
DMARC — Domain-based Message Authentication
DMARC p=none — monitoring only, no enforcement. Spoofing is trivial.
RFC 7489 — DMARC

DMARC ties SPF and DKIM together with a policy that tells receiving servers what to do with unauthenticated mail. p=none is monitoring only — attackers love it.

Transport Security Can you intercept email in transit? No No MTA-STS or DANE — mail transport encryption is opportunistic only
> probing certificate pinning via DNSSEC chain...
DANE / TLSA
No DANE — TLS is opportunistic and can be downgraded
MTA-STS
MTA-STS not enforced — STARTTLS stripping possible
TLS-RPT
No TLS-RPT — TLS failures go unnoticed by the domain owner
RFC 8460 — SMTP TLS Reporting

TLS-RPT enables reporting of TLS negotiation failures. Without it, STARTTLS downgrade attacks leave no trace.

Brand & Certificate Security Can you fake this brand's identity? Likely DMARC is monitor-only p=none (RFC 7489 §6.3) — spoofed mail is not blocked, brand faking is trivial
BIMI
No BIMI — no verified brand logo in email clients. Visual impersonation is easy.
CAA — Certificate Authority Authorization
No CAA — any CA on earth can issue a valid certificate for this domain. An attacker can obtain a trusted cert from the cheapest, fastest CA and stand up a convincing HTTPS phishing clone or MitM proxy.
RFC 8659 — CAA

CAA records specify which Certificate Authorities are authorized to issue certificates. Without CAA, an attacker could obtain a valid cert from any CA.

DNS Infrastructure Can you poison the DNS? No DNSSEC signed and validated, cryptographic chain of trust verified
> validating cryptographic chain of trust...
DNSSEC
No DNSSEC — DNS responses can be spoofed or poisoned
RFC 4033–4035 — DNSSEC

DNSSEC adds cryptographic signatures to DNS responses, preventing cache poisoning and response forgery. Without DNSSEC, an attacker can forge DNS answers.

NS Delegation
0 nameservers detected — single point of failure
Attack Surface Discovery What can you find from the outside?
Subdomain Discovery (Multi-Source)
0 subdomains discovered via CT logs + DNS probing + Nmap SAN extraction
Subdomain
map[cert_count:10 cname_target:shops.myshopify.com first_seen:2026-02-13T18:34:33 is_current:true issuers:[Let's Encrypt Google Trust Services] name:account.shop.hak5.org source:ct]
map[cert_count:1 first_seen:2026-01-04T10:35:42 is_current:true issuers:[Google Trust Services] name:beta.payloadstudio.hak5.org source:ct]
map[cert_count:3 first_seen:2026-01-03T16:00:33 is_current:true issuers:[Google Trust Services] name:c2.hak5.org source:ct]
map[cert_count:4 first_seen:2026-01-02T12:13:31 is_current:true issuers:[Let's Encrypt] name:c2c2-dev.hak5.org source:ct]
map[cert_count:4 cname_target:ghs.googlehosted.com first_seen:2026-01-28T04:34:42 is_current:true issuers:[Google Trust Services] name:capi.hak5.org source:ct]
map[cert_count:4 first_seen:2026-01-12T07:18:34 is_current:true issuers:[Let's Encrypt] name:cloud-c2.hak5.org source:ct]
map[cert_count:6 first_seen:2025-12-27 is_current:true issuers:[Google Trust Services Let's Encrypt] name:community.hak5.org source:dns]
map[cert_count:12 cname_target:shops.myshopify.com first_seen:2026-02-18T13:12:04 is_current:true issuers:[Let's Encrypt Google Trust Services] name:defcon.hak5.org source:ct]
map[cert_count:2 first_seen:2026-01-21T16:01:49 is_current:true issuers:[Let's Encrypt] name:devwiki.hak5.org source:ct]
map[cert_count:3 first_seen:2025-12-12T12:52:31 is_current:true issuers:[Google Trust Services] name:docs.hak5.org source:ct]
map[cert_count:2 cname_target:ghs.googlehosted.com first_seen:2026-01-08T13:57:21 is_current:true issuers:[Google Trust Services] name:downloads.hak5.org source:ct]
map[cert_count:7 cname_target:r167241.tryinvision.com first_seen:2026-02-04T00:37:55 is_current:true issuers:[Google Trust Services Amazon] name:forums.hak5.org source:ct]
map[cert_count:3 cname_target:ghs.googlehosted.com first_seen:2025-12-15T02:49:16 is_current:true issuers:[Google Trust Services] name:hakshop.hak5.org source:ct]
map[cert_count:4 cname_target:docs.hak5.org first_seen:2026-02-07T17:37:17 is_current:true issuers:[Google Trust Services] name:help.hak5.org source:ct]
map[cert_count:10 first_seen:2026-01-02T11:56:11 is_current:true issuers:[Let's Encrypt] name:irc.hak5.org source:ct]
map[cert_count:2 first_seen:2025-12-29T16:01:23 is_current:true issuers:[Let's Encrypt] name:jenkins.hak5.org source:ct]
map[cert_count:8 cname_target:hak5.thinkific.com first_seen:2026-02-18T00:01:54 is_current:true issuers:[Let's Encrypt] name:learn.hak5.org source:ct]
map[cert_count:6 cname_target:ghs.googlehosted.com first_seen:2025-12-27 is_current:true issuers:[Google Trust Services Let's Encrypt] name:mail.hak5.org source:dns]
map[cert_count:6 cname_target:aa5b270f96-hosting.gitbook.io first_seen:2026-02-17T07:02:07 is_current:true issuers:[Google Trust Services] name:olddocs.hak5.org source:ct]
map[cert_count:9 cname_target:shops.myshopify.com first_seen:2026-02-18T12:25:34 is_current:true issuers:[Let's Encrypt Google Trust Services] name:payloads.hak5.org source:ct]
SaaS Services (TXT Record Discovery)
1 SaaS service detected via DNS TXT verification records
Google Workspace
Secret Exposure
No exposed secrets detected in common paths
Intelligence Metadata Can you verify this independently?
SHA-3-512 Integrity Hash
e153f8390edaf8e5b678379c503d6acf1e3c724c37dbf0d1d06fc1943e65fee564e1ddc746b9c1b08e2726f4de321d5a821849239c9f936b0ec73ee31c71d05a
RFC References
12
Tool Version
v26.25.82
Posture Hash
8123a63f650e2e28…
Verification Commands — Independently verify every finding