Recon Report
sra.io
Target Assessment
Target Hardness:
Hardened
3 defensive layers
|
5 attack surface gaps
1 weakness
ANALYSIS CONFIDENCE
MODERATE
70/100
ACC:65%
CUR:76
MAT:consistent
Email Spoofability Can you spoof email from this domain? Unlikely SPF and DMARC quarantine policy enforced
> analyzing sender authorization policy...
SPF — Sender Policy Framework
SPF is configured — sender authorization restricts spoofing
RFC 7208 — Sender Policy Framework
SPF allows domain owners to specify which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of their domain. Without SPF, any server can forge the envelope sender.
> enumerating cryptographic selectors...
DKIM — DomainKeys Identified Mail
DKIM selectors reveal mail infrastructure
— signatures found
RFC 6376 — DomainKeys Identified Mail
DKIM provides cryptographic authentication of email messages. Selector names often reveal email providers (e.g., google, selector1 = Microsoft 365).
> evaluating enforcement policy...
DMARC — Domain-based Message Authentication
DMARC p=quarantine — authentication failures are sequestered, not rejected. Forensic telemetry is preserved (RFC 7489 §7). Some organizations maintain this posture as a deliberate monitoring strategy. See NIST SP 800-177
RFC 7489 — DMARC
DMARC ties SPF and DKIM together with a policy that tells receiving servers what to do with unauthenticated mail. p=none is monitoring only — attackers love it.
Transport Security Can you intercept email in transit? No No MTA-STS or DANE — mail transport encryption is opportunistic only
> probing certificate pinning via DNSSEC chain...
DANE / TLSA
No DANE — TLS is opportunistic and can be downgraded
MTA-STS
MTA-STS not enforced — STARTTLS stripping possible
TLS-RPT
No TLS-RPT — TLS failures go unnoticed by the domain owner
RFC 8460 — SMTP TLS Reporting
TLS-RPT enables reporting of TLS negotiation failures. Without it, STARTTLS downgrade attacks leave no trace.
Brand & Certificate Security Can you fake this brand's identity? Likely DMARC quarantine flags but does not reject spoofed mail (RFC 7489 §6.3) — no BIMI or CAA (RFC 8659) reinforcement leaves brand impersonation largely unaddressed
BIMI
No BIMI — no verified brand logo in email clients. Visual impersonation is easy.
CAA — Certificate Authority Authorization
No CAA — any CA on earth can issue a valid certificate for this domain. An attacker can obtain a trusted cert from the cheapest, fastest CA and stand up a convincing HTTPS phishing clone or MitM proxy.
RFC 8659 — CAA
CAA records specify which Certificate Authorities are authorized to issue certificates. Without CAA, an attacker could obtain a valid cert from any CA.
DNS Infrastructure Can you poison the DNS? Possible DNSSEC is not deployed, DNS responses are not cryptographically verified
> validating cryptographic chain of trust...
DNSSEC
No DNSSEC — DNS responses can be spoofed or poisoned
RFC 4033–4035 — DNSSEC
DNSSEC adds cryptographic signatures to DNS responses, preventing cache poisoning and response forgery. Without DNSSEC, an attacker can forge DNS answers.
NS Delegation
2 nameservers detected
pdns07.domaincontrol.com
pdns08.domaincontrol.com
Attack Surface Discovery What can you find from the outside?
Subdomain Discovery (Multi-Source)
0 subdomains discovered via CT logs + DNS probing + Nmap SAN extraction
| Subdomain |
|---|
map[cert_count:1 cname_target:amplifysra-cyfxhac2ajf6cxdy.eastus-01.azurewebsites.net first_seen:2026-01-31T00:00:00Z is_current:true issuers:[] name:amp.sra.io source:ct] |
map[cert_count:1 first_seen:2025-07-16T00:00:00Z is_current:true issuers:[] name:apps.sra.io source:ct] |
map[cert_count:— cname_target:autodiscover.outlook.com first_seen:— is_current:true issuers:[] name:autodiscover.sra.io source:dns] |
map[cert_count:— first_seen:— is_current:true issuers:[] name:beep.sra.io source:external_tools] |
map[cert_count:— first_seen:— is_current:true issuers:[] name:boru.sra.io source:external_tools] |
map[cert_count:1 first_seen:2025-12-23T00:00:00Z is_current:true issuers:[] name:canopener.sra.io source:ct] |
map[cert_count:— first_seen:— is_current:true issuers:[] name:coeus.sra.io source:external_tools] |
map[cert_count:1 first_seen:2026-04-07T13:06:21Z is_current:true issuers:[] name:collector.sra.io source:ct] |
map[cert_count:— first_seen:— is_current:true issuers:[] name:contact.beep.sra.io source:external_tools] |
map[cert_count:1 first_seen:2026-04-09T12:22:36Z is_current:true issuers:[] name:cti.sra.io source:ct] |
map[cert_count:1 cname_target:d3hh2gp5tqqui3.cloudfront.net first_seen:2025-05-30T00:00:00Z is_current:true issuers:[] name:docs.siftr.sra.io source:ct] |
map[cert_count:1 first_seen:2026-02-09T13:08:33Z is_current:true issuers:[] name:estrellita.sra.io source:ct] |
map[cert_count:2 cname_target:halv21.azurewebsites.net first_seen:2025-05-08T18:35:22Z is_current:true issuers:[] name:hal.sra.io source:ct] |
map[cert_count:1 cname_target:d1lkgp6g4qg1bo.cloudfront.net first_seen:2025-10-23T00:00:00Z is_current:true issuers:[] name:intel.sra.io source:ct] |
map[cert_count:2 cname_target:securityriskadvisors.github.io first_seen:2026-01-22T19:14:48Z is_current:true issuers:[] name:labs.sra.io source:ct] |
map[cert_count:— first_seen:— is_current:true issuers:[] name:omni.sra.io source:external_tools] |
map[cert_count:— first_seen:— is_current:true issuers:[] name:phl-fw01.sra.io source:external_tools] |
map[cert_count:1 first_seen:2026-01-15T18:06:42Z is_current:true issuers:[] name:phlfw01.sra.io source:ct] |
map[cert_count:1 cname_target:d1yz4u0949qkev.cloudfront.net first_seen:2025-05-25T00:00:00Z is_current:true issuers:[] name:portal.siftr.sra.io source:ct] |
map[cert_count:1 first_seen:2026-03-22T16:25:43Z is_current:true issuers:[] name:scalr.sra.io source:ct] |
SaaS Services (TXT Record Discovery)
5 SaaS services detected via DNS TXT verification records
Microsoft 365
Adobe
Atlassian
Facebook / Meta
Google Workspace
Secret Exposure
No exposed secrets detected in common paths
Intelligence Metadata Can you verify this independently?
SHA-3-512 Integrity Hash
5243b8beb5667b5bca0c55187fd3dab6ac9810b3e6c168b7de09b7234490917dac8e2df2a268ff579166ee1dd38072e16b30b47a4ceb93c21bbde91811ce7a2c
RFC References
12
Tool Version
v26.46.24
Posture Hash
5ef56aa45e459d87…